Missed a few days? This effort has been going on longer than we care to admit.
Get caught up in "Recent". This page last updated February 13, 2016
February 13, 2016
OK, Ladies and Gentlemen, girls and boys, we are all about to get a very high-end education in what Presidential politics is really all about.
First, our condolences to the family and friends of the late Justice Antonin Scalia. Beyond that, condolences to the Nation at large: as some have noted, he was a giant.
That said, this will impact the Presidential race in more ways than most can imagine.
We can be sure that the usurper will make an appointment. We can be almost as sure that conservatives in The Senate will not confirm. For an idea of how significant this might be [we do not agree with the political stance (winners/losers) in this article, just the likely impacts in law rather than which might be “good” and which “evil”]: http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2016/02/13/3749464/the-simply-breathtaking-consequences-of-justice-scalias-death/ .
Despite the early noises suggesting Sri Srinivasan [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sri_Srinivasan], look for the short list from The White House to be female; relatively young; we are thinking, from the South [Georgia?]. Bonus points to those he’s appointed to their current position; double-bonus points to one who has dismissed one or more suits against Obama and/or his pen and phone. Liberal goes without saying.
Scalia was on that SCOTUS bench for roughly 30 years. Whoever comes next could certainly, considering advances in medicine, be there as long. This can, and likely will, become just plain ugly.
With that in mind, please go to our “Action Items” page and take appropriate action.
We continue to petition to The White House in support for “Hierarchy of Law”,
designed to keep UN & similar attempts against US
sovereignty, as regarding arms and the Law of the Sea Treaty, from ever
allowing the UN or others to dictate to the US, while still allowing the
US to adopt positions in line with such. Do you really want the UN
telling us what to do about an invasion at our border, for example?
Please help this effort to protect US Sovereignty and The US Constitution. More, here. Or, take our word for it and immediately go to The White House site to sign: http://wh.gov/if8nV
[making use of the WhiteHouse.gov site ensures that nobody need leave any information here, potentially saves us a lot of work, and provides opportunity for visitors to also choose from a variety of other petitions that they may also wish to support...or not].
Let’s get this thing over the 100K signatures-in-30-days threshold for a response…in record time.
you are familiar with the place “III”, or “3%” holds in the gun rights
realm, then it becomes simple: just 3% of the “likes” for National
Association for Gun Rights on Facebook would be sufficient. A similar
proportion of NRA “likes” would get the job done as well. That doesn’t
go directly to questions of sovereignty, either; those who dislike
“foreign entanglements”; those opposed to the Law of the Sea Treaty; or
any number of other specifics, each of which would be covered by the
proposal at issue. [Gun people tend to not be “joiners”, so the
potential pool from such resources could be far greater than indicated
by “likes” for NRA or NAGR, so the proportion needed might be
significantly less…but every signature counts, as does timeliness; please do whatever research you need to make yourself comfortable with signing ASAP and sign].
The confirmation email for having created a petition includes:
We need 100,000 signatures, and would rather have twice that -- how about a half million? -- by March 9, 2016.
We've a companion petition at http://wh.gov/if8n0 with the objective of
maintaining and even improving this petition access as a tool for responsive
government [novel concept, huh?]. Signatures also requested for that one.
September 17, 2011, Constitution Day: we begin another effort at blogging. Previous efforts have ended unceremoniously for a variety of reasons; for the most part we simply have not found it appropriate to pretend that we had something of significance to say publicly each and every day, too easily then neglecting for too long, distracted by daily life rather than making such an effort a part of daily life.
This process may well be subjected to similar problems but should result in a different end: for this blogging has a new intent added to the old, one of being an exercise in and a marking of self discipline [do not expect perfection; we don't, though we will strive for minimal evidence of our imperfections]. A daily entry is a part of our objective: it may be as brief and seemingly dismissive as " Nothing today", "We, too, sometimes need a break: this is one of ours.", or " Have noted news; gathering thoughts", but we are committed to at least checking in each day, and ask readers consider doing likewise. [Entries may or may not be keyed to or even linked to other parts of the site, but we will endeavor to minimize choppiness.]
Too often, we may go on too long. We may try to cover too many bases, resulting momentarily in a light treatment of heavy material, but we believe longer treatments will be available elsewhere on or at least through this site.
One of our objectives is to not waste a visitors' time. We don't mind even offending folk, if it is all honest and above-board; but we would be disappointed if, having visited, somebody left feeling they'd wasted their time [much as we don't mind somebody leaving our table not being uncomfortably full, but would feel badly if they left hungry despite their efforts to become at least reasonably satisfied].
That will have to do for today: life interrupts.
Addendum, October 4, 2011
Any post more than a week old will be subject to being moved from this page and archived. For the immediate future, the Archive will be available on another page on the site.
Addendum, October 6, 2011
We will, from time to time, review and edit for typos et al, so that later readers may not be subjected to them.
Addendum, December 9, 2011
We have reorganized [again] so that the single most recent blog entry is readily available without having to mess with a slide bar much. Recent entries will go to another page, eventually to archives, though those pages will be as we read, oldest first. We hope this makes things easier for visitors.
Our goal is to follow the above plan in our lives and our business, thus being a part of returning our country, The United States of America, to the Republic it was envisioned and designed to be and The Great Experiment -- the Rule of Law -- brought to the world by the Founding Fathers.
We ask readers -- and others -- consider doing likewise.
Taking no ads, the only revenue to keep this site going is out of our own pockets and should arguably
be going to other things, from the few items sometimes in our store, and whatever
donations might be put in the tip jar on our Comment/Support page.
To the extent that you think reasonable
-- and please think for a moment about how long it would take you to put something like this together,
and what it would cost you, in energy and money, to then make it and keep it available on the web --
we ask you consider contributing to our delinquency.